BILL · 1993–94 SESSION

HB 2282: District court judges pro tm

Providing that a district court judges salary is not reduced when a pro tempore judge serves due to an affidavit of prejudice.

Summary

  • An additional exception is added to the 30-day limit on a district court judge's use of judges pro tempore. A judge's salary will not be reduced if the reason a judge uses a pro tempore judge is that the judge is disqualified by an affidavit of prejudice.

From the Senate Bill Report (HB 2282), written by the Legislature's nonpartisan staff. Read the full report ↗

Enacted Enacted · Chapter 18, Laws of 1994
  1. IntroducedJan 12, 1994
  2. Out of committee
  3. Passed HouseFeb 8, 1994
  4. Passed SenateMar 2, 1994
  5. Governor
  6. LawMar 21, 1994
Prime sponsor
Barbara Holm (D-35)
Introduced
January 12, 1994 in the House
Last action
March 21, 1994
Session law
Chapter 18, Laws of 1994

Sponsors

Prime sponsor: Barbara Holm (D-35)

1 co-sponsor (1 Democrat, 0 Republicans)

Votes

House · Final Passage

February 8, 1994
Version voted on: HB 2282
90 Yea 0 Nay 0 Absent 8 Excused
PartyYeaNayAbsentExcused
Democrat61002
Republican29006
How each member voted

Yea (90)

Senate · Final Passage

March 2, 1994
Version voted on: HB 2282
44 Yea 0 Nay 2 Absent 3 Excused
PartyYeaNayAbsentExcused
Democrat26020
Republican18003
How each member voted

History

The Legislature's online data doesn't include step-by-step history for sessions before 2001. Its final status is shown above, and the official bill page may have more.

HB 2282 in other sessions

Bill numbers restart every two years, so the same number is a different bill in each session.

Report wrong or missing information on this page