BILL · 1995–96 SESSION · LATEST VERSION ESHB 2279

HB 2279: Growth management decisions

Specifying the status of challenged growth management regulations during a period of remand.

Summary

  • The authority of a hearings board to affect the validity of a comprehensive plan or development regulations during the period of remand is eliminated. All development permits vest under the comprehensive plan or development regulations that were found out of compliance until a new comprehensive plan or development regulations are adopted.

From the Substitute House Bill Report (SHB 2279), written by the Legislature's nonpartisan staff. Read the full report ↗

Did not pass Did not pass · passed House, stalled in Senate
  1. IntroducedJan 9, 1996
  2. Out of committee
  3. Passed HouseFeb 12, 1996
  4. Passed Senatestopped here
  5. Governor
  6. Law
Prime sponsor
Steven Hargrove (R-23)
Introduced
January 9, 1996 in the House
Last action
March 7, 1996
Versions
HB 2279, ESHB 2279

Sponsors

Votes

House · Final Passage

February 12, 1996
Version voted on: ESHB 2279
66 Yea 31 Nay 0 Absent 1 Excused
PartyYeaNayAbsentExcused
Democrat72900
Republican59201
How each member voted

Yea (66)

Excused (1)

History

The Legislature's online data doesn't include step-by-step history for sessions before 2001. Its final status is shown above, and the official bill page may have more.

HB 2279 in other sessions

Bill numbers restart every two years, so the same number is a different bill in each session.

Report wrong or missing information on this page