BILL · 2003–04 SESSION · LATEST VERSION ESHB 2112

HB 2112: Public works contracting

Reviewing public works projects that use the general contractor/construction manager procedure authorized in chapter 39.10 RCW.

Summary

  • Requires the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) to study the use of general contractor/construction manager (GC/CM) procedures in public works projects.
  • Creates an oversight committee to examine the practices of the GC/CM procedures for public works projects.
  • Lowers the population threshold for counties to use the design-build and GC/CM procedures from counties over 450,000 to counties over 200,000.
  • Increases the number of projects the school district project review board may approve from 10 projects to 20 projects, of which no more than two may be valued between $5 million and $10 million.
  • Creates a public hospital district (PHD) project review board.
  • Allows PHDs with total revenues over $15 million a year to use the design-build procedure, or to use the GC/CM procedure as long as the project is approved by the PHD project review board.

From the Substitute House Bill Report (SHB 2112), written by the Legislature's nonpartisan staff. Read the full report ↗

Did not pass Did not pass · passed House, stalled in Senate
  1. IntroducedFeb 25, 2003
  2. Out of committeeMar 10, 2003
  3. Passed HouseMar 17, 2003
  4. Passed Senatestopped here
  5. Governor
  6. Law
Prime sponsor
Kathy Haigh (D-35)
Introduced
February 25, 2003 in the House
Last action
January 14, 2004
Budget
Has a fiscal note
Versions
HB 2112, ESHB 2112

AN ACT Relating to alternative public works contracting procedures;

Sponsors

Prime sponsor: Kathy Haigh (D-35)

3 co-sponsors (3 Democrats, 0 Republicans)

Votes

House · Final Passage

Passed March 17, 2003
Version voted on: ESHB 2112
72 Yea 26 Nay 0 Absent 0 Excused
PartyYeaNayAbsentExcused
Democrat52000
Republican202600
How each member voted

Yea (72)

1 other recorded vote (amendments, procedural motions)

House · Amendment 191 by Schindler (page 2, line 15)

March 17, 2003
Version voted on: ESHB 2112
43 Yea 55 Nay 0 Absent 0 Excused
PartyYeaNayAbsentExcused
Democrat05200
Republican43300
How each member voted

Nay (55)

History

  1. House Rules "X" file. (ESHB 2112)
  2. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status. (ESHB 2112)
  3. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status. (ESHB 2112)
  4. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status. (ESHB 2112)
  5. By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading. (ESHB 2112)
  6. First reading, referred to Government Operations & Elections. (ESHB 2112)
  7. Floor amendment(s) adopted. (ESHB 2112)
  8. Third reading, passed; yeas, 72; nays, 26; absent, 0; excused, 0. (ESHB 2112)
  9. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading. (ESHB 2112)
  10. 1st substitute bill substituted. (ESHB 2112)
  11. 1st substitute bill substituted.
  12. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee. (ESHB 2112)
  13. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
  14. Made eligible to be placed on second reading. (ESHB 2112)
  15. Made eligible to be placed on second reading.
  16. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading. (ESHB 2112)
  17. CB - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by State Government. (ESHB 2112)
  18. CB - Executive action taken by committee. (ESHB 2112)
  19. CB - Executive action taken by committee.
  20. CB - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by State Government.
  21. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
  22. Referred to Capital Budget. (ESHB 2112)
  23. Referred to Capital Budget.
  24. SG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass. (ESHB 2112)
  25. SG - Executive action taken by committee.
  26. SG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
  27. First reading, referred to State Government.

HB 2112 in other sessions

Bill numbers restart every two years, so the same number is a different bill in each session.

Report wrong or missing information on this page