Reforming competency evaluation and restoration procedures.
Summary
Creates new sections to be added to Title 10 regarding how competency evaluations are conducted and the substance of competency evaluation reports; the scope of the statutory provision regarding evaluations is narrowed to include only those cases where the competency of the defendant is at issue; these new sections only apply to counties with populations greater than 1.5 million persons, and they expire on June 30, 2011.
Creates a separate statutory provision regarding cases where a defendant has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity or asserted a defense of diminished capacity.
Requires that only one expert or professional person evaluate the competency of the defendant, rather than two, and that the competency evaluation be performed by or in the consultation with a developmental disabilities professional if it appears that the characteristics of developmental disability may be a significant factor in the defendant's ability to participate in the criminal proceeding; applies only to counties with populations greater than 1.5 million persons, and the applicable section expires on June 30, 2011.
Requires the court to order that a competency evaluation shall take place in the jail or detention facility where the defendant is being held and permits a defendant to be evaluated at a state hospital facility only upon determination of the evaluator, except in limited circumstances; applies only to counties with populations greater than 1.5 million persons, and the applicable section expires on June 30, 2011.
Requires that the competency evaluation report of a defendant held in jail shall be completed within 21 days from the time that the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) receives the court's order and other relevant documents; applies only to counties with populations greater than 1.5 million persons, and the applicable section expires on June 30, 2011.
Removes the requirement that a professional evaluating a defendant for competency provide an opinion as to whether the defendant is a substantial danger to other persons or presents a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety or security.
From the Engrossed House Bill Report (ESB 5519), written by the Legislature's nonpartisan staff. Read the full report ↗
Did not passDid not pass · passed Senate, stalled in House