BILL · 2015–16 SESSION
HB 2570: Spec inquiry judge subpoenas
Limiting the subpoena power of special inquiry judges.
Summary
- Prohibits a public attorney, corporation counsel, city attorney, special inquiry judge, or certain other persons from searching or seizing personal banking records without: (1) The informed consent of the account holder; (2) A warrant, based upon probable cause, describing the person, place, or thing to be searched or seized; or (3) A legally recognized exception to the warrant requirement.
From the Bill Digest (HB 2570), written by the Legislature's nonpartisan staff. Read the full report ↗
Did not pass Did not pass · died in committee
- IntroducedJan 15, 2016
- Out of committeestopped here
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Governor
- Law
- Prime sponsor
- David Taylor (R-15)
- Introduced
- January 15, 2016 in the House
- Last action
- March 10, 2016
AN ACT Relating to limiting the subpoena power of special inquiry judges;
Sponsors
Prime sponsor: David Taylor (R-15)
8 co-sponsors (0 Democrats, 8 Republicans)
Votes
No recorded floor votes. This measure never reached a floor vote.
History
- By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
- First reading, referred to Judiciary (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
HB 2570 in other sessions
Bill numbers restart every two years, so the same number is a different bill in each session.
- HB 2570 (2025–26) Digital school transcripts
- HB 2570 (2019–20) Accessory dwelling units
- HB 2570 (2017–18) Collab drug therapy database
- HB 2570 (2013–14) Med quality assur commission
- HB 2570 (2011–12) Metal property theft
- HB 2570 (2009–10) Initiative & referendum
- HB 2570 (2007–08) Juvenile motor vehicle theft
- HB 2570 (2005–06) Tobacco product sampling