BILL · 2017–18 SESSION · LATEST VERSION SHB 2587

HB 2587: Special prosecuting attorney

Concerning required disclosures for special prosecuting attorneys.

Summary

  • Addresses disclosure requirements when a county enters into a contract with a special prosecuting attorney.
  • Requires that a contract for the services of a special prosecuting attorney be made publicly available.

From the House Bill Report (HB 2587), written by the Legislature's nonpartisan staff. Read the full report ↗

Did not pass Did not pass · stalled on the House floor
  1. IntroducedJan 10, 2018
  2. Out of committeeFeb 2, 2018
  3. Passed Housestopped here
  4. Passed Senate
  5. Governor
  6. Law
Prime sponsor
Javier Valdez (D-46)
Introduced
January 10, 2018 in the House
Last action
February 19, 2018
Versions
HB 2587, SHB 2587

AN ACT Relating to required disclosures for special prosecuting attorneys;

Sponsors

Prime sponsor: Javier Valdez (D-46)

4 co-sponsors (4 Democrats, 0 Republicans)

Votes

No recorded floor votes.

History

  1. Referred to Rules 2 Consideration. (SHB 2587)
  2. Referred to Rules 2 Consideration.
  3. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee. (SHB 2587)
  4. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
  5. Referred to Rules 2 Review. (SHB 2587)
  6. Referred to Rules 2 Review.
  7. JUDI - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass. (SHB 2587)
  8. Minority; do not pass. (SHB 2587)
  9. Minority; do not pass.
  10. JUDI - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
  11. First reading, referred to Judiciary (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

HB 2587 in other sessions

Bill numbers restart every two years, so the same number is a different bill in each session.

Report wrong or missing information on this page