WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT · MARCH 1, 2000

State v. Curry

The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Tony Anthony Curry, Petitioner; The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Eric Stewart Haller, Petitioner; The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Virgil Jay Easter, Petitioner

Constitutionality of a law
Docket
No. 58752-3, 58753-1, 58754-0
Decided
March 1, 2000
Citation
829 P.2d 166; 118 Wash. 2d 911
Cited by later opinions
162
Judges
Durham
Status
Published

Why this case is listed

Constitutionality of a law

The court considers whether a statute or ordinance is constitutional.

…pay costs under former RCW 10.01.160. Under that statute, a defendant may be ordered to pay for expenses…

Legislation discussed

Full opinion text isn't available to scan yet; see the excerpt above and the official opinion.

Report wrong or missing information on this page