WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT · MAY 17, 2001

State v. Schmidt

The State of Washington v. Zachary B. Schmidt, Petitioner The State of Washington v. Marlin L. Ayers

Constitutionality of a law Ballot initiative or referendum Cites a specific bill
Docket
No. Nos. 69741-8; 69833-3
Decided
May 17, 2001
Citation
143 Wash. 2d 658; 23 P.3d 462; 2001 Wash. LEXIS 374
Cited by later opinions
12
Judges
Johnson, Madsen, Smith
Status
Published

Why this case is listed

Constitutionality of a law

The court considers whether a statute or ordinance is constitutional.

…against ex post facto laws because the amended statute punished only future conduct. In State v. Ayers…


Ballot initiative or referendum

The case involves a statewide initiative or referendum.

…limited. See Laws or 1995, ch. 129, § 16 (Initiative Measure No. 159). The 1996 amendment expanded the…


Cites a specific bill

The opinion discusses a House or Senate bill by name.

…amended in 1994 by Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2319, “Violence Reduction Programs.” Laws of…

Legislation discussed

  • HB 2319 (1995–96) Indigency determination
    Cited as “Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2319” — matched by bill number and the year stated next to it · Did not pass · died in committee

Other references found in the text

These could not be tied to one specific bill (bill numbers repeat each session, and initiatives to the people are not bills).

Initiative 159

Report wrong or missing information on this page