WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT · NOVEMBER 2, 2000
In re the Personal Restraint of Matteson
In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Michael Matteson, In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Russell Taylor, In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Jason Hull
Constitutionality of a law Cites a specific bill- Docket
- No. Nos. 68310-7; 68486-3; 68492-8
- Decided
- November 2, 2000
- Citation
- 142 Wash. 2d 298
- Cited by later opinions
- 59
- Judges
- Alexander, Bridge
- Status
- Published
Why this case is listed
Constitutionality of a law
The court considers whether a statute or ordinance is constitutional.
…Taylor. Together petitioners argue that the Legislature improperly granted the DOC the authority to transfer…
Cites a specific bill
The opinion discusses a House or Senate bill by name.
…state budget. That bill, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5180, was entitled, “An Act Relating to fiscal…
Legislation discussed
Other references found in the text
These could not be tied to one specific bill (bill numbers repeat each session, and initiatives to the people are not bills).