WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT · APRIL 14, 1994
Soundgarden v. Eikenberry
Soundgarden, Et Al, Respondents, v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry, as Attorney General, Et Al, Appellants, Norm Maleng, as Prosecuting Attorney, Interested Party
Constitutionality of a law Cites a specific bill- Docket
- No. 59947-5; 60093-7
- Decided
- April 14, 1994
- Citation
- 1994 Wash. LEXIS 255; 62 U.S.L.W. 2651; 22 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2385; 30 A.L.R. 5th 869; 123 Wash. 2d 750; 871 P.2d 1050
- Cited by later opinions
- 73
- Judges
- Smith, Andersen
- Status
- Published
Why this case is listed
Constitutionality of a law
The court considers whether a statute or ordinance is constitutional.
…declaring unconstitutional the "Erotic Sound Recordings" statute (House Bill 2554, Laws of 1992, ch.…
Cites a specific bill
The opinion discusses a House or Senate bill by name.
…unconstitutional the "Erotic Sound Recordings" statute (House Bill 2554, Laws of 1992, ch. 5, codified as RCW 9…
Legislation discussed
- HB 2554 (1991–92) Erotic sound recordings