WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT · JUNE 6, 2019
State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc.
STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. ARLENE'S FLOWERS, INC., D/B/A Arlene's Flowers and Gifts, and Barronelle Stutzman, Appellants. Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed, Respondents, v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., D/B/A Arlene's Flowers and Gifts, and Barronelle Stutzman, Appellants.
Constitutionality of a law Ballot initiative or referendum- Docket
- No. NO. 91615-2
- Decided
- June 6, 2019
- Citation
- 441 P.3d 1203
- Cited by later opinions
- 26
- Judges
- McCLOUD
- Status
- Published
Why this case is listed
Constitutionality of a law
The court considers whether a statute or ordinance is constitutional.
…apply to her conduct and that if they do, those statutes violate her state and federal constitutional rights…
Ballot initiative or referendum
The case involves a statewide initiative or referendum.
…same-sex couples. Laws of 2012, ch. 3, § 1 (Referendum Measure 74, approved Nov. 6, 2012). Freed proposed…
Legislation discussed
- SB 6239 (2011–12) Marriage & dom. partnerships
- HB 2661 (2005–06) Human rights commission
- HB 1130 (1997–98) Institution of marriage
Scanned text source: official opinion PDF.