WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT · SEPTEMBER 13, 2001

Guillen v. Pierce County

Ignacio Guillen, as Guardian v. Pierce County, Petitioner Robert Whitmer, Individually and as Guardian v. Chin S. Yuk

Legislative power & process Constitutionality of a law Ballot initiative or referendum
Docket
No. Nos. 68535-5; 69327-7
Decided
September 13, 2001
Citation
144 Wash. 2d 696; 181 A.L.R. Fed. 741
Cited by later opinions
21
Judges
Bridge, Madsen
Status
Published

Why this case is listed

Legislative power & process

Single-subject and title rules, separation of powers, or veto power.

…“consent” of state officials. An analogy to the separation of powers among the branches of the Federal Government…


Constitutionality of a law

The court considers whether a statute or ordinance is constitutional.

…112 Wn.2d 30, 33-36, 769 P.2d 283 (1989). See Laws of 1973, ch. 1. “Public record” includes “any writing…


Ballot initiative or referendum

The case involves a statewide initiative or referendum.

…November 1972, Washington voters approved Initiative Measure No. 276, a “strongly worded mandate for broad…

Legislation discussed

Other references found in the text

These could not be tied to one specific bill (bill numbers repeat each session, and initiatives to the people are not bills).

Initiative 276

Report wrong or missing information on this page