WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT · OCTOBER 22, 2020

Reykdal v. Espinoza

Constitutionality of a law Cites a specific bill
Docket
No. 98731-9
Decided
October 22, 2020
Citation
473 P.3d 1221; 196 Wash. 2d 458
Cited by later opinions
6
Status
Published

Why this case is listed

Constitutionality of a law

The court considers whether a statute or ordinance is constitutional.

…application of the statute.1 FACTS The legislature passed a…


Cites a specific bill

The opinion discusses a House or Senate bill by name.

…update to RCW 28A.300.475, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5395 (ESSB 5395), at the request of the Office…

Legislation discussed

  • SB 5395 (2019–20) Sexual health education
    Cited as “LAWS OF 2020, ch. 188” — matched by session-law chapter · Enacted · Chapter 188, Laws of 2020
  • HB 1286 (2009–10) Candidates for public office
    Cited as “LAWS OF 2009, ch. 222” — matched by session-law chapter · Enacted · Chapter 222, Laws of 2009
  • SB 5297 (2007–08) Sexual health education
    Cited as “LAWS OF 2007, ch. 265” — matched by session-law chapter · Enacted · Chapter 265, Laws of 2007
  • SB 5395 (2005–06) Voting devices/paper records
    Cited as “ESSB 5395” — matched by bill number and the year stated next to it · Enacted · Chapter 242, Laws of 2005

Scanned text source: official opinion PDF.

Report wrong or missing information on this page