BILL · 2003–04 SESSION
HB 1307: Actions against agency rules
Revising procedures in actions against agency rules.
Summary
- The burden of proof in demonstrating the invalidity of an agency action is no longer with the party asserting its invalidity, but rather is silent.
- Actions challenging the validity of a rule is not longer required to be filed only in Thurston County, but may also be filed in the county of the petitioner's residence or principal place of business, or in a county where property owned by the petitioner and affected by the contested rule is located.
From the House Bill Analysis (HB 1307), written by the Legislature's nonpartisan staff. Read the full report ↗
Did not pass Did not pass · died in committee
- IntroducedJan 22, 2003
- Out of committeestopped here
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Governor
- Law
- Prime sponsor
- Mike Armstrong (R-12)
- Introduced
- January 22, 2003 in the House
- Last action
- January 12, 2004
AN ACT Relating to actions asserting invalidity of agency rules;
Sponsors
Prime sponsor: Mike Armstrong (R-12)
9 co-sponsors (0 Democrats, 9 Republicans)
Votes
No recorded floor votes. This measure never reached a floor vote.
History
- By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
- By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
- By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
- First reading, referred to State Government.
HB 1307 in other sessions
Bill numbers restart every two years, so the same number is a different bill in each session.
- HB 1307 (2025–26) Child care product sales tax
- HB 1307 (2023–24) Physician bargaining
- HB 1307 (2021–22) Drug offense sentencing
- HB 1307 (2019–20) VFW chapters/sales & use tax
- HB 1307 (2017–18) Dual speed limits
- HB 1307 (2015–16) Residen'l services & support
- HB 1307 (2013–14) Sexual assault prot. orders
- HB 1307 (2011–12) Science & public policy